Statements can be recorded in two methods as provided under the Code of Criminal Procedure 1972. Section 162 provides that statements can be recorded by the police officer whereas section 164 provides that statements can be recorded by the Magistrate. In this article recording of statements has been discussed under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Recording of the statement under section 164 arises if the investigation officer forwards to record the statement of the complainant or when the complainant on its own motion approaches the Magistrate for recording their statement. Along with the scope and objective, evidentiary value of the statement recorded by the Magistrate is also discussed in the article. In the last section of article provision as to recording of statement of rape victim has been discussed briefly. Overview
Any statement made by the accused cannot be regarded as confession unless there is an admission of guilt. Therefore, every statement is not a confession. Section 164 (2)(3) and (4) says how the confession is to be recorded. There is a provision in the section which lays down the process of recording statements of the accused who is temporarily or permanently, mentally or physically disabled. Section 164 also provides that unless the accused voluntarily expresses to become the witness the magistrate cannot regard previously recorded statements as examination-in-chief nor the accused shall be subjected to cross-examination.
In case of offences relating to rape and under section 509 of the Indian Penal Code, the instance commission of offence is brought to the notice of the police, the statement shall be recorded by the Judicial Magistrate. If any statement or confession has been made to a magistrate, such magistrate shall forward the recording to the magistrate by whom the case is to be tried or inquired into.
Admission is not included in confession. Although every statement made is not a confession unless the guilt is admitted. In case of any mixed statement in which there is the presence of incriminating facts but there is no admission of guilt in the statement, it would not amount to a confession. These statements can be described as admission instead of confession.
According to sub-section of section 164 of the Code, a Magistrate is authorised to record statements or confessions of the individual even if he has no jurisdiction in the case. In such a case where a Magistrate having no jurisdiction records the statement or confession shall forward it to the Magistrate having jurisdiction or by whom the case is to be tried.
The section provides that any Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate can record the statement prior to the commencement of the trial. However, the section does not provide for the recording of statements by the police officer.
Confession or statement made under the section 164 of the Code is not regarded as a substantive piece of evidence. The only purpose of such a statement or confession is for contradicting or corroborating with the maker of such a statement. By the recourse to the section 145 of the Evidence Act the contradiction under section 164 be elicited. However, when a confession is made it is ordinarily admissible in evidence. The statement given is considered as a relevant fact which can be acted upon.
Further, based on the statement or confession made voluntarily an accused can be convicted. Warning by the Magistrate- Before recording any confession, the Magistrate ensures to explain to the individual that he or she is not bound to make a confession. If such an individual wishes to make a confession after the warning given by the Magistrate then it can be used as a piece of evidence against him.
Retracted confession does not imply the involuntary nature of the confession. Retracted confession is when any confession made by an accused is subsequently retracted. It can be used against such accused if supported by independent and corroborative evidence.
It is to be determined by the court, whether the accused was willing to give confession voluntarily or not, by the mental state of the accused at the time of giving a confession. Reasons must be recorded by the court regarding the retracted confession as well as the confession made initially.
According to the Amendment made in 2013, sub-section 5A has been inserted. This sub-section specifically deals with recording statement in case of offences relating to Rape and intention to outrage the modesty of a woman.
The Magistrate shall as soon as it has been brought to his knowledge by the police officer record the statement of the victim. The police officer is duty-bound to immediately take the victim to the nearest Judicial Magistrate when such commission of such offence comes to his knowledge.
Further, it has been provided under the section that while recording a statement of any individual being temporarily or permanently, physically or mentally disabled, the Magistrate shall take help of the interpreter or special educator and such recording shall be video graphed.