The power of position has always been misused or abused by the authorities in India. Often to take revenge or harm reputations or to create obstacles such as in the time of elections, opposite parties make allegations which results in wrongful arrest by the authorities. This article has described the scenario of wrongful arrest in India along with the statutory provisions which are made to safeguard and protect the victims of wrongful arrest. While discussing the rights of arrested persons in the light of wrongful arrest, remedies available to the victim of wrongful arrests have been emphasized in this article.Overview
When an individual is held wrongfully against their will or is taken into custody by a legal authority such as a police officer is known as a wrongful arrest.
In India, the rule of ‘innocent until proven guilty’ is followed. This implies that the burden of proving any allegation made against an individual lies upon the prosecution. The judicial administration has the duty for ensuring the security of basic human rights as well as upheld those rights.
Every individual including an accused or arrested person has certain rights as granted by the Constitution of India. The accused can seek protection from criminal liability. The motive behind this provision is to safeguard the rights of an accused or arrested individual as they are more vulnerable to their rights being violated. Provisions relating to the rights of arrested persons have been laid down in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). The Constitution of India also provides protection against arrest and unlawful detention in certain cases under Article 22.
The National Police Commission of India issued a report stating that approximately 60% of arrests made by police officers are unnecessary as well as unjustified. The procedures laid down under the CrPC as well as the provisions of the Constitution of India have also not been complied with by the police officers while making arrests.
A wrongful arrest can otherwise be referred to as an illegal arrest. The most important ingredient for constituting wrongful arrest is the absence of any probable cause along with non-abiding of the statutory procedures. Any unlawful restraint of personal liberty of an individual or freedom of movement also constitutes wrongful arrest made by the authority purporting to act under the law.
The illegal or wrongful arrest comes under the category of criminal wrong which requires compensatory damages to the victim. However, the damages will only be awarded by proving the illegality of such arrest.
The rights of an arrested person under the Code of Criminal Procedure are-
Other rights of arrested persons include the right to stay silent, the right against double jeopardy, the right to bail, the right to Legal Aid, right to consult a legal practitioner of his or her choice
Section 358 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 lays down a provision for compensation to persons arrested in absence of any ground. When a complaint by a person causes the police officer to arrest another person and such arrest appears to be groundless or has no sufficient ground for arrest to the Magistrate is known as a wrongful arrest.
And the Magistrate has the authority to award compensation to be paid to such person arrested groundlessly of Rs100 by the person on whose complaint police made the arrest. This section states that the compensation awarded to the arrested person shall be recovered as a fine and in failure to pay the compensation shall be sentenced to imprisonment for 30 days by the Magistrate.
Habeas Corpus is another remedy one can be sought for release from unlawful or illegal detention. A writ of Habeas Corpus can be issued by the Supreme Court under Article 32 and by the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
An individual may also make use of reasonable force for defending himself from any unlawful arrest. The force used by the individual must be minimum and as necessary to defend himself in the circumstance. However, any force used in excess of the required will make the innocent individual liable for restraint.